Home
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Peer-reviewed Journal | Impact factor 8.1 | ISSN: 2581-3250 | CAS Source Indexed | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September 2026 - Vol. 36, Issue 3 

🌟 GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences (GSCBPS) 🌟

Low Publication Charges | Fast Editorial Processing | Crossref DOI Linking | Transparent Peer-Review Process

Publishing quality research in Biological Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medicine, Healthcare and Allied Life Sciences.

e-ISSN: 2581-3250 | Impact Factor: 8.1 | Established: 2017 | Charges: USD 35 / INR 2100

📄 Submit Manuscript 👉 Author Guidelines 📚 Published Articles 

A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • A Randomized Controlled Study of Intramuscular Acetaminophen- Diclofenac Versus Acetaminophen-pentazocine For Pain Relief During Manual Vacuum Aspiration In University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital
  • A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital

Maduka Chike Joachim 1, Onah Livinus Nnanyereugo 2, * and Eze Obiechina Chijioke 2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Science, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Medicince Enugu State University Teaching Hospital/College of medicine, Enugu State, Nigeria.
 
Research Article
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2025, 30(03), 261-271.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscbps.2025.30.3.0114
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2025.30.3.0114
Received on 05 February 2025; revised on 15 March 2025; accepted on 17 March 2025
The management of first trimester miscarriages using manual vacuum aspiration is a cheap, fast and safe surgical method of uterine evacuation. However, this procedure generate pain as a result of cervical manipulation, insertion of cannula and suctioning of uterine cavity. This pain quite often, is intolerable to the patient. Therefore, an effective pain management intervention is necessary to abolish this pain.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare combined acetaminophen-diclofenac with acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in a randomised controlled study at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital.
Objective: To determine and compare the effectiveness of combined acetaminophen-diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration.
Methodology: This was a triple-blind randomised controlled study, that compared the effectiveness of combined acetaminophen-diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine as a multimodal analgesia during manual vacuum aspiration. A total of 112 participants were randomised into two groups. Participants in group A (56 patients) received combined acetaminophen-diclofenac while participants allocated in group B (56 patients) received acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration.
The primary outcome, measured the occurrence of mild or no pain during the procedure. Secondary outcome measured the need for rescue analgesia used during the procedure. The data was entered into SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA 2011) for statistical analysis.
Result: There was statistically significant difference in the effectiveness, when combined acetaminophen-pentazocine compared to combined acetaminophen-diclofenac was used during manual vacuum aspiration (P value=0.001). Majority 44(78.6%) of the participants in combined acetaminophen-pentazocine group experienced mild pain compared to 25(44. 6%) of participants in acetaminophen-diclofenac group and their mean pain scores were 2.8929(SD±1.1067) and 4.1786(SD±1.7899) respectively. When the mean pain scores of both groups were compared using the independent t-test, there was a statistically significant difference (P value = 0.001), with participants in combined acetaminophen-pentazocine group suffered less pain. 
Conclusion:  Combined acetaminophen-pentazocine as a form of analgesia during MVA was more effective when compared to combined acetaminophen-diclofenac.
Manual Vacuum Aspiration; Acetaminophen; Diclofenac; Pentazocine; Effectiveness
https://gscbps.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCBPS-2025-…

Preview Article PDF

Maduka Chike Joachim, Onah Livinus Nnanyereugo and Eze Obiechina Chijioke. A randomized controlled study of intramuscular acetaminophen- diclofenac versus acetaminophen-pentazocine for pain relief during manual vacuum aspiration in university of Maiduguri teaching hospital. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2025, 30(3), 261-271. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2025.30.3.0114


📝 Copyright, Licensing and Permissions: © Copyright Author(s). This article is published under the 🌐 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


⚠️ Disclaimer: The statements, opinions, interpretations, and data presented in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s). GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences (GSCBPS), the editors, reviewers, editorial board, and publisher disclaim responsibility for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of the information contained in this article.


🏆 Get Publication Certificate 📄 Download Letter of Acceptance 🔗 Verify Crossref DOI 📘 View Issue Cover Page 👨‍🔬 Editorial Board 📑 Table of Contents 

🚀 Publish Your Research in International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal - GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences (GSCBPS)

Submit your manuscripts from Biological Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medicine, Healthcare, Biotechnology and Allied Life Sciences etc.

🌍 International Journal   |   👨‍🔬 Transparent Peer Review Process   |   🌐 Open Access Publishing   |   🔗 Crossref DOI 
⚡ Fast Editorial Processing   |   💰 Low Publication Charges

📝 Submit Your Manuscript 📘 Author Guidelines 💰 Publication Charges 

✅ No Submission Fee •  📜 Free Publication Certificate • 🌍 Global Visibility

⭐ Popular Pages


  • 🌍 International Journal
  • 🌐 Open Access Journal
  • 👨‍⚖️ Peer-Reviewed Journal
  • 💰 Low APC Journal
  • 🚀 Fast Publication Journal
  • ⚡ Fast-Track Peer-Review
  • 🔗 Crossref DOI Journal
  • 📖 Refereed Journal
  • 📈 High Impact Journal
  • 🧬 International Biology Journal
  • 💊 International Pharmacy Journal
  • 📝 Publish Research Paper

✍️ Author Resources


  • 📝 Publish Research Paper
  • 📖 Author Guidelines
  • 🎯 Aims and Scope
  • 💳 Article Processing Charges
  • 📤 Submit Manuscript
  • 📄 Cover Letter
  • ✍️ Author Declaration Form
  • 📄Track Manuscript Status
  • 📜 Get Publication Certificate
  • 📚 Journal Past Issue Archive
  • 🔎 Journal Indexing

⚖️ Journal Policies


  • ⚖️ Publication Ethics
  • 🛡️ Plagiarism Policy
  • 👨‍🔬 Peer Review Policy
  • 👨‍⚖️ Peer Review Process
  • 📖 Open Access Publishing
  • 📜 Copyright & Licensing
  • 🔗Author Self-Archiving Policy
  • 👥 Authorship Policy
  • 📊 Data Sharing Policy
  • 🤖 AI Usage Policy

Copyright © 2026 GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution