Home
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Peer-reviewed Journal | Impact factor 8.1 | ISSN: 2581-3250 | CAS Source Indexed | Crossref DOI

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September 2026 - Vol. 36, Issue 3 

🌟 GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences (GSCBPS) 🌟

Low Publication Charges | Fast Editorial Processing | Crossref DOI Linking | Transparent Peer-Review Process

Publishing quality research in Biological Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medicine, Healthcare and Allied Life Sciences.

e-ISSN: 2581-3250 | Impact Factor: 8.1 | Established: 2017 | Charges: USD 35 / INR 2100

📄 Submit Manuscript 👉 Author Guidelines 📚 Published Articles 

Effectiveness of bilateral block transversus abdominis plane approach linea semilunar compared to lateral approach as post-laparotomy colorectal analgesia

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Effectiveness of Bilateral Block Transversus Abdominis Plane Approach Linea Semilunar Compared To Lateral Approach As Post-laparotomy Colorectal Analgesia
  • Effectiveness of bilateral block transversus abdominis plane approach linea semilunar compared to lateral approach as post-laparotomy colorectal analgesia

Kadek Indriani Adwitya *, I Made Subagiartha, I Wayan Aryabiantara, I Made Gede Widnyana and Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi

Resident of at Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management, and Intensive Care, Udayana University, Sanglah General Hospital Bali.
 
Research Article
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2025, 32(03), 286-293.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscbps.2025.32.3.0348
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2025.32.3.0348
Received on 16 August 2025; revised on 19 September 2025; accepted on 22 September 2025
Background: Patients who undergo midline incision colorectal surgery often experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, which lead to high level of opioid need. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a component of multimodal analgesia which May reduce postoperative pain and amount of opioid consumption. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Linea Semilunaris approaches to Lateral approach of TAP block on the postoperative pain, duration of the postoperative analgesia effect and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with general anesthesia
Methods: This study was a single blind random controlled trial. Forty patients who met the criteria and were planned for colorectal surgery under general anesthesia at Prof. Dr. IGNG Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar. Subjects were then randomly allocated into 2 groups, group P1 were planned to receive bilateral TAP block with semilunar approach, while group P2 were planned to receive bilateral TAP block with lateral approach. Both treatment groups received Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml on each side of the abdomen postoperatively. Furthermore, an evaluation of pain intensity (VAS) was carried out at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, recording the duration of the analgesic and the quality of postoperative recovery which was assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire.
Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. Statistical tests showed that group P1 had lower pain intensity (VASE) at 6 hours (median: 0 vs. 3), 12 (mean: 2.42 vs. 3.36), and 24 (mean:2.45 vs. 3.18) (p < 0.001), longer duration of analgesic effect (minutes) (median:460 vs. 260, p < 0.001), lower total opioid morphine requirement (mg) in 24 hours (median 3 vs. 5, p < 0.001) and higher quality of recovery (QoR-40 score) of patients at 24 hours (median 180 vs. 147.5, p < 0.001) and 48 hours (median: 181.5 vs. 151.5, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Bilateral TAP block in with semilunar approach show better analgesia  effectiveness and quality of recovery after midline incision colorectal surgery than lateral approach
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block; Lateral; Semilunar; Colorectal laparotomy; Quality of postoperative recovery; Postoperative analgesia
https://gscbps.gsconlinepress.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/GSCBPS-2025-…

Preview Article PDF

Kadek Indriani Adwitya, I Made Subagiartha, I Wayan Aryabiantara, I Made Gede Widnyana and Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi. Effectiveness of bilateral block transversus abdominis plane approach linea semilunar compared to lateral approach as post-laparotomy colorectal analgesia. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2025, 32(3), 286-293. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2025.32.3.0348


📝 Copyright, Licensing and Permissions: © Copyright Author(s). This article is published under the 🌐 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


⚠️ Disclaimer: The statements, opinions, interpretations, and data presented in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s). GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences (GSCBPS), the editors, reviewers, editorial board, and publisher disclaim responsibility for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of the information contained in this article.


🏆 Get Publication Certificate 📄 Download Letter of Acceptance 🔗 Verify Crossref DOI 📘 View Issue Cover Page 👨‍🔬 Editorial Board 📑 Table of Contents 

🚀 Publish Your Research in International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal - GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences (GSCBPS)

Submit your manuscripts from Biological Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medicine, Healthcare, Biotechnology and Allied Life Sciences etc.

🌍 International Journal   |   👨‍🔬 Transparent Peer Review Process   |   🌐 Open Access Publishing   |   🔗 Crossref DOI 
⚡ Fast Editorial Processing   |   💰 Low Publication Charges

📝 Submit Your Manuscript 📘 Author Guidelines 💰 Publication Charges 

✅ No Submission Fee •  📜 Free Publication Certificate • 🌍 Global Visibility

⭐ Popular Pages


  • 🌍 International Journal
  • 🌐 Open Access Journal
  • 👨‍⚖️ Peer-Reviewed Journal
  • 💰 Low APC Journal
  • 🚀 Fast Publication Journal
  • ⚡ Fast-Track Peer-Review
  • 🔗 Crossref DOI Journal
  • 📖 Refereed Journal
  • 📈 High Impact Journal
  • 🧬 International Biology Journal
  • 💊 International Pharmacy Journal
  • 📝 Publish Research Paper

✍️ Author Resources


  • 📝 Publish Research Paper
  • 📖 Author Guidelines
  • 🎯 Aims and Scope
  • 💳 Article Processing Charges
  • 📤 Submit Manuscript
  • 📄 Cover Letter
  • ✍️ Author Declaration Form
  • 📄Track Manuscript Status
  • 📜 Get Publication Certificate
  • 📚 Journal Past Issue Archive
  • 🔎 Journal Indexing

⚖️ Journal Policies


  • ⚖️ Publication Ethics
  • 🛡️ Plagiarism Policy
  • 👨‍🔬 Peer Review Policy
  • 👨‍⚖️ Peer Review Process
  • 📖 Open Access Publishing
  • 📜 Copyright & Licensing
  • 🔗Author Self-Archiving Policy
  • 👥 Authorship Policy
  • 📊 Data Sharing Policy
  • 🤖 AI Usage Policy

Copyright © 2026 GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution